You have now left the main British Psychological Website - return to the main site >>
  Back to the Main BPS Site
Home
Return to Main BPS Site

You Are Here: Home > Conference Proceedings > 2012 Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology Annual [...] > Furthering understanding of motivational processes [...]

 
 

Conference Proceedings

Abstract Details

 

2012 Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology Annual Conference


Conference Venue: Grand Connaught Rooms, London
Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology (DSEP)

From: 18 Apr 2012
To: 20 Apr 2012
 
 
Symposia/Symposium

Furthering understanding of motivational processes in physical education and youth sport

Convenor: Dr Christopher Spray
Loughborough University


Theme: Within the broad-ranging theme of ‘psychology of participation in sports and exercise’, the focus of this symposium will centre on young people’s motivation in sport and school physical education (PE), and in particular, the roles played by key social agents. Motivation has proved a popular area of empirical endeavour for a number of decades and this symposium affords the opportunity to showcase current research efforts in a themed session.

Objectives: (1) To present on-going research programmes into young people’s motivation in the physical domain. (2) To critique the collective contribution, review the strength of evidence, and discuss future challenges faced by motivation researchers.

Relevance of individual contributions: The five papers illustrate the breadth of current work in this field. Targeted contexts include PE (Barnes, Taylor, Warburton), youth sport (Smith), leisure-time physical activity (Taylor, Warburton) and laboratory-based work (Healy). Investigators draw on achievement goal and self-determination theory perspectives (Smith, Taylor, Warburton) but, also in evidence, are social comparison theory (Barnes) and the self-concordance model (Healy). In addition to possessing strong theoretical underpinnings, the contributions display a number of design and statistical approaches, namely cross-sectional, (Barnes, Taylor), longitudinal (Warburton), observation (Smith), and experimental (Healy). Key outcomes include leisure-time physical activity (Taylor, Warburton), physical self-concept/self-esteem (Barnes, Warburton), congruence between objective and perceived coaching behaviours (Smith), and goal adoption/self-regulation in physical activity (Healy, Warburton).

 

Paper 1:

Correlates of class and individual social comparisons in physical education

Jemima S. Barnes, Christopher M. Spray, Loughborough University

Objectives: Drawing from theory and research into social comparison processes, the present study sought to determine the co-existence of class and individual comparisons in school physical education (PE). The main and interactive effects of these types of comparisons were examined in relation to pupils’ physical self-concept (PSC), as well as self-reported behavioural engagement and disaffection in class.

Design: A cross-sectional design was employed to examine relationships among comparisons and outcomes in PE.

Methods: 545 children (264= males, 276=females, 5=undisclosed; Mage=13.89, SD=1.57 years) from two schools in England completed measures of perceived relative standing in class (PRSC), perceived relative standing to a chosen individual comparison target (PRSI), engagement, disaffection and PSC.

Results: Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that higher PRSC predicted greater PSC and engagement but lower disaffection. In addition, comparing downwards in terms of the comparison choice was associated with enhanced engagement. Interactions showed that chosen individual targets moderated the association between PRSC and engagement and disaffection. Specifically, when PRSC was low, making an upward individual comparison diminished engagement and enhanced disaffection. PRSI did not moderate relations when PRSC was high.

Conclusions: Demonstrating the need for researchers to examine multiple frames of reference simultaneously, pupils engage in both individual and class average comparisons in PE and these are associated with reported levels of PSC, engagement and disaffection. Further research is required to ascertain the interplay between group and individual comparisons and their relations with important outcomes in PE.

 

Paper 2:

Examining the relationship between the objective and perceived coach created motivational climate in youth sport

Nathan Smith, Eleanor Quested, Paul Appleton, Joan Duda, University of Birmingham

Objectives: Exclusive reliance on self-reported views of the psychological environment created by sports coaches could be reduced by developing objective measures of the climate. Past studies centred on objective ratings have primarily pulled from achievement goal theory to assess coaches’ task- and ego-involving behaviours. This novel study integrated achievement goal theory and self-determination theory to examine congruence between the observed motivational climate, assessed via a new multi-dimensional objective rating system, and coaches’ views of the motivational climate manifested on their team.

Design: A field-based study was employed to collect video, audio and questionnaire data.

Methods: 26 UK-based grassroots football coaches were recruited. Coaches were filmed once during their normal training activities. Content of video and audio recordings were coded according to whether the environment was autonomy supportive and controlling, task and ego involving, relatedness supporting and thwarting, and was marked by structure. Coaches’ perceptions of the climate they create for their players were tapped via a multi-dimensional coach-created climate questionnaire.

Results: Preliminary results suggest the observation instrument is a reliable measure of the motivational climate created by grassroots football coaches (Weighted Kappa=0.72). Based on 26 assessments, the observed profile of the coach-created climate in grassroots football is provided and the degree of congruency between the observed and perceived motivational climates presented.

Conclusions: Examining equivalence between observed and perceived motivational climates provides information on whether coaches’ perceptions align with reality. This information could be used to inform interventions which aim to increase coaches’ self-regulation of behaviour.

 

Paper 3:

Comparison of school-based correlates of physical activity in PE and leisure-time

Ian M. Taylor, Christopher M. Spray & Natalie Pearson, Loughborough University

Objectives: Using self-determination and achievement goal theories, we compared the associations among the teacher-and peer-created motivational environment, children’s motivation towards PE, and their physical activity behaviour in PE and outside of school.

Design: A cross-sectional study design was adopted to examine the relationships among the study variables.

Methods: 939 primary school children (53 per cent male) took part in the study by completing a multi-section questionnaire exploring the study variables. Multilevel modelling was used to examine the data.

Results: Children’s intrinsic motivation (b=.14) and introjected regulation (b=.08) towards PE positively predicted physical activity in PE. In contrast, identified regulation towards PE positively predicted (b=.16), whereas amotivation negatively predicted (b=–.09), out of school physical activity. Of the environmental factors, the degree to which children perceived their peers to focus on improvement positively predicted (b=.08) physical activity in PE. On the other hand, the degree to which children perceived their peers to focus on competition (b=.07) and their teacher to provide autonomy support (b=.15) positively predicted out of school physical activity.

Conclusions: Cross-sectional evidence is provided that PE classes may offer a suitable arena for physical activity intervention. Nonetheless, the environmental and motivational correlates of physical activity in PE and leisure-time may differ.

 

Paper 4:

Peer and teacher climates in physical education: A longitudinal perspective

Victoria E. Warburton, University of East Anglia

Objective: To examine the influence of peer and teacher climates to changes in pupils’ motivation in physical education (PE).

Design: Longitudinal Design: The influence of perceptions of teacher and peer climates in PE to changes in pupils’ achievement goal adoption, leisure-time physical activity, self-esteem and attitudes towards physical activity over a school year was determined.

Methods: 792 pupils from Years 7, 8 and 9 of a secondary school in the east of England completed a questionnaire assessing perceptions of teacher and peer climates, approach-avoidance goal adoption, self-esteem, attitudes towards physical activity and leisure-time physical activity on three occasions towards the end of each school term.

Results: Data will be analysed using multilevel methods to assess: (1) the amount of variance in the variables which can be attributed to pupil or class effects; (2) the amount of change over the course of the school year which can be attributed to pupil or class effects; and

(3) the change in the dependent variables which can be accounted for by perceptions of teacher and peer climates when controlling for prior levels of the dependent variables.

Conclusions: Implications for future research and for physical education practice will be discussed.

 

Paper 5:

Goal motivation and self-regulation for unattainable goals

Laura Healy, Nikos Ntoumanis & Joan Duda, University of Birmingham; Constantine Sedikedes, University of Southampton

Objectives: Based on the self-concordance model, this research investigated personal goal motives (autonomous or controlled) when striving for unattainable goals. Autonomous motives were expected to result in more adaptive behaviour, especially if the goal was perceived to be unattainable earlier in the goal striving process.

Design: The study employed a laboratory-based within-subject design.

Methods: 85 athletes were recruited from competitive team sports. In the main trial, participants were required to cover an individual distance goal on a cycle ergometer in eight minutes. Manipulated feedback made the goal seem unattainable. Participants could choose to persist, cease the task, or reengage in an alternative goal. Personal goal motives were measured pre-trial while the psychological ease of disengagement and reengagement were measured post-trial. Following the trial, participants also reported when they perceived the goal to be unattainable.

Results: Structural equation modelling showed that for all participants autonomous motives negatively predicted ease of disengagement. However, for those who perceived the goal to be unattainable before the fifth minute, autonomous motives positively predicted ease of reengagement and the pathway to disengagement became non-significant. The model remained unchanged when controlling for gender, goal difficulty, goal efficacy and hours of training.

Conclusions: This study showed that autonomous motives may lead to difficulty in disengaging from an unattainable goal, although if the goal is perceived to be unattainable earlier in striving, individuals with autonomous motives may be more able to reengage in an alternative goal.

 


 

Back to Conference Details

 
Contact Details | Privacy | Legal | Accessibility |
^ Top of Page